
An actual conversation
v 4.03: proof if needed that not all roleplayers lead interesting lives
An actual conversation
Here’s what some Passing Idiots had to say:
Not all cack-handed people are wrong, just like not all wrong people are cack-handed. After all I’m not. Not cack-handed I mean, not not wrong. So turning cack-handed should not turn not wrong people wrong just like turning wrong should not turn not cack-handed people cack-handed. But people don’t turn wrong anyway except when driving and thats only a wrong turn. I’m not sure if not cack-handed people turn cack-handed regardless of whether they were wrong or not wrong or if they were not wrong and driving and turned wrong in the not wrong way or not wrong in the wrong way. So turning cack-handed when you were not and were not wrong in the wrong way is not likely to make you wrong in the wrong way even when driving and turn wrong in the not wrong way. Hope that all makes sense 🙂
Oh yeah, I also prefer original monkeys to those new imposters 🙂
My head hurts now after that…
What do ambidextrous people naturally tend towards then? Wrong or not wrong? .. or maybe bi.. err.. dunno how to say that in wrongspeak :oP
Wrongspeak for bi is “just plain greedy” 😀
Leave a Comment